The peptides human chorionic gonadrotropin (hCG) and Serostim-brand human growth hormone (hGH); and the anti-aromatase inhibitor Arimidex (anastrozole).
As well anyone can follow along with Rich on his youtube channel to follow his example. After all its not all about the steroids without proper diet and training regime steroids will not do shit for you. Rich offers a ton of advice on diet and training to ensure goals are met.
The program is nothing short or GENIUS or crazy. You decide. The methods utilized by Rich are simple but effective. The bottom line is the progressive nature of his logic added with feeder workouts before bed. I say GENIUS!
The bottom line is this Rich constantly ups the ante from week to week to achieve massive results. Constantly confusing the body forcing it to grow. Even without the steroids this system will pack on tons of muscle. The key here is progressive. Start out 4 meals a day 15 minute cardio in the morning and 45 minutes lifting. On second week you have 5 meals a day 20-25 minutes cardio and 55-65 minutes lifting. Every week adding more food cardio amd lifting all the way to the point where you’re eating 10 meals a day an hour and fifteen minutes of cardio amd two hours lifting. Plus feeder workouts before bed. Sounds tough but bottom line is #whateverittakes!
#nevergiveup
Alex Jones Channel Suspended by youtube May 04, 09
Alex Jones Suspended By YouTube (Action Needed!)
The Official Alex Jones account has been suspended from YouTube. Spread the word! We all need to take action to get YouTube to reinstate TheAlexJonesChannel.
We need to build these channels back up again as quickly as possible. DON’T LET GOOGLE WIN!
We need to support THElNFOWARRlOR and get the word out to as many people as possible. We also need to bombard YouTube’s Help Center with complaints about this diabolical censorship so that we can get TheAlexJonesChannel reinstated.
Official Address:
YouTube, LLC
901 Cherry Ave.
San Bruno, CA 94066
USA
Phone: +1 650-253-0000
Fax: +1 650-253-0001
Please ask them to reinstate “thealexjoneschannel”. Be polite but show them we are upset and have reason to be!
NewWorldRebel also has a good suggestion:
“After you let YouTube & Google know what you think, try this: drop a line at the Pittsburgh Post telling them what you think of their actions at: http://biz.post-gazette.com/contact/c…
One’s no better than the other, but the Tribune may enjoy the chance of attacking the ‘Post’ for degrading free speech. Fight them the way they fight us. 10 people will make no difference. A few thousand of us doing this will definitely reap results. The people’s greatest weapon is themselves.”
Thanks to everyone who takes action, and thanks to eldrak21 and all the others who posted this vid before me 🙂
This rather remarkable UFO was filmed by a farmer apparently working in his fields in Russia. Not much is known about the video (below), the exact location of its filming or the individual that filmed it. It is receiving a fair bit of coverage on Russian UFO and paranormal forums and many UFO experts seem rather impressed with it.
One UFO researcher, Mr Avi Moas of Las Vegas, Nevada, referred to the craft as a ‘Mothership’.
Allegedly the filming took place on May 3 of this year. UFOs are seen all over Russia and the former Soviet Union and for many rural folk they are an almost common occurrence.
I am writing you this letter in response to your recent decisions to probe deeper into anti-gravity technology and the so called “X-Files”, which in all probably are hiding some amazing and beneficial technologies that I think the American people are more than ready for. In terms of the National Security Risk Factor associated with disclosing material related to the UFO/extraterrestrial phenomena, I want to point out that many of us already know the truth were just waiting for the Government to come forward and admit to it.
As an avid UFO researcher, I have come across a few things that I would really like your National Security and Intelligence team to probe deeper into:
1. NASA was ordered to hand over documents in response to a March 27, 2007 federal Court ruling by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is hiding documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )
2. Former Area 51 employee and whistle blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Project for the US Military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. The fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates) have been investigated by Boeings [GRASP], NASAs Advance Concepts Office, & NASAs Gravity Probe B.
Thank you for your time and dedicated service to the American people.
Our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable time.
Sincerely,
THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC
Anti Gravity Disclosure movement at MIT
Here is a memo you should FAX to:
National Security Advisor James L. Jones
National Intelligence Advisor Dennis Blair
Here’s that memo:
SUBJ: National Security Risk assessment for disclosure of UFO / Antigravity files.
What we know: Unidentified Flying Objects have been witnessed and photographed. Flying saucers or disc shaped craft, as well as a flying triangle shaped craft have been spotted, yet neither has been confirmed as belonging to the US Military.
1. NASA was ordered to hand over documents in response to a March 27, 2007 federal Court ruling by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is withholding secret documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )
2. Former Area 51 employee and whistle blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Project for the US Military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. The fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates) have been investigated by Boeings [GRASP], NASAs Advance Concepts Office, & NASAs Gravity Probe B.
What we don’t know: The origins of this technology, and why the Government is being so secretive about it? Many have suspicions that these craft are extraterrestrial in origin or that the technology was back-engineered from crashed alien space craft. Conspiracy theories abound as the American people receive lies and cover-ups from their Government instead of answers.
National Security Risk Assessment: There are several Risk Factors associated with disclosing the truth about extraterrestrial life, however there are no risks associated with disclosing anti-gravity technology. The notion that our enemies could use this technology against us is completely nullified by the technical feasibility of such a project. Russia, Iran and China are perhaps the only countries with the economic infrastructure capable of even producing such technology. An assembly line capable of manufacturing fleets of these aircraft would require an impossible feat of engineering. The only realistic applications for this technology are in space exploration through NASA
Thank you for your time and dedicated service to the American people. Our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable era of human history.
Sincerely,
MIT Researcher Responds to “Anti”-Gravity Tech
Roswell Aliens – Witness Descriptions
Roswell Flying Saucer – The Memory Foil
REAL Alien SpaceCraft & Propulsion technologies
B2 Bomber and Electrogravitics
(Biefeld-Brown) Declassified
A Theory of Everything? – By Garrett Lisi (Part 1)
A Theory of Everything? – By Garrett Lisi (Part 2)
YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE THIS MORE PROOF END TIMES ARE HERE
After watching, please reupload them ASAP and spread them. Direct people to this channel and post links to our Youtube page – Myspace and soon website.
Everyone needs to see this!
This is 100% proof of FEMA coffins FEMA camps and FEMA graves! This is the best series on the net to show this. I have spent a lot of time putting it together so USE IT!
I often tell people, “Knowledge is the exchange of different realities” I truly believe that.
If you want to feel good about yourself, feel empowered and realizes exactly how week the New World Order and the Illuminati are, then watch this video. This is deep thinking at its best and it should break something in you and snap you out of the shell your in.
This is information the Illuminati would love to bury. This is information that will change your life. I promise…
The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association
President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
New York City, April 27, 1961
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:
I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.
You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.
You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.
We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the "lousiest petty bourgeois cheating."
But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.
If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.
I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight "The President and the Press." Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded "The President Versus the Press." But those are not my sentiments tonight.
It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.
Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.
Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.
If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.
On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.
It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.
My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.
I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future–for reducing this threat or living with it–there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security–a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President–two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.
I
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle
dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.
Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.
The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.
On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.
I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.
Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America–unions and businessmen and public officials at every level– will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.
And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.
Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.
II
It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.
No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news–for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security–and we intend to do it.
III
It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.
And so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.
Student’s mother charged on 10th anniversary of Columbine massacre
A woman wearing a trench coat outside Gulf Breeze High School was arrested Monday after police found she had brought two guns and a knife to campus.
Judy Hall’s arrest came on the 10-year anniversary of the Columbine High School shootings that left 12 students and a teacher dead in suburban Denver. The two students who carried out the massacre were dressed in trench coats.
Police are not sure why Hall, 61, brought the guns to campus on the anniversary of the Columbine shootings.
“The mother did not identify that she was trying to make a connection to Columbine,” Gulf Breeze Police Chief Peter Paulding said. “But it did involve a trench coat and guns, and this is the 10th anniversary.”
Hall of Finch Drive in Gulf Breeze was booked into Santa Rosa County Jail on Monday on charges of carrying a concealed gun, bringing a gun to a school, and resisting arrest without violence. She still was in custody Monday night.
No one was injured at Gulf Breeze High, and no weapons were fired in the incident.
Paulding said Hall was arrested after going to the school to talk with Gulf Breeze school resource officer Kerstan Tatro about an incident at the school Friday involving Hall’s son, who is a freshman.
Hall was concerned about some students confronting her son about postings he allegedly made on the Web sites YouTube and MySpace that made reference to students at the school being hurt, according to a police report.
“The rumor was he was posting a hit list,” Paulding said. “I believe it is unlikely it would have been up for that length of time and someone would not have caught it.”
Paulding said the department checked both Web sites and could not find any postings about Gulf Breeze students. The last time Hall’s son logged into his MySpace account was Jan. 6, the chief said.
Trench coat
After Tatro initially met Hall in the school parking lot Monday morning, he told her to meet him in his office to discuss her concerns. At the time, she was not wearing a trench coat, according to a police report.
Later, from his office window, Tatro saw Hall put on a trench coat. Paulding said it appeared that Hall’s son tried to talk to his mother out what she was doing.
Tatro immediately left his office to confront Hall after seeing her put on the trench coat. Tatro approached Hall in the parking lot and the two started discussing the Internet posting rumor, the report said.
The officer told Hall the rumor came up Friday, but it did not concern her son. Tatro told Hall that a student with a similar name to her son’s was the subject of the Internet rumors, according to a police report.
Hall told the officer that “anyone could walk in the school with a trench coat on and a gun in their pocket and start killing people,” Gulf Breeze police said in a news release.
Hall then told the officer that she had a handgun in her coat pocket. Tatro searched her and found an unloaded .22-caliber gun.
The officer also found a folding knife on Hall, police said.
Other officers went to the school to help Tatro, and a loaded .380-caliber gun was found in Hall’s truck. Hall’s home was searched, and two handguns, two rifles and a shotgun were found, police said.
Students on edge
The incident had parents and students worried about safety at the school.
About 170 students were checked out of school by parents Monday, said Becky Brown, assistant principal for student services. The school has about 1,500 students.
Denice Brown picked up her son at his request. Brown’s 16-year-old son is a friend of Hall’s son, and he was upset.
“We know the family and don’t know what brought (Hall) to this point,” Brown said. “This is not a part of her normal character.”
Doris Platt received an e-mail about the incident from Gulf Breeze middle and high schools. She has children who attend both schools.
“I wonder what the lady was thinking,” she said. “I understand you want to prove a point, but this is not the way to go about it.”
Initially, sophomore Casey Platt, thought talk of the incident was a joke.
“Then, I was kind of scared,” she said. “People were saying random stuff, but the teachers talked to us about it and said everything was OK. Then, I was at ease.”
Gulf Breeze High School Principal Sylvan Ladner said in his 35 years with the school this was the first time he recalls a parent being arrested for having a gun on campus.
“Our school is safe, and we are always looking for measures to make it even safer,” he said. “Most of our exterior doors are kept locked from the start of first-period class until the afternoon.”
PENSACOLA- Its getting harder to bear arms…
Guns and ammunition are flying off the shelves at local stores.
Business owners say it’s been happening ever since the new administration took office.
First on 3 Channel Three’s Grace White shows us what one local shop is doing to make up for the shortfall.
Larry Blackburn, Ammunition Sales: “It’s hard to find ammunition, it’s hard to find some of these weapons, I’ve got people calling me up saying I can’t find it… can you help me?”
Larry Blackburn says he’s been ordering supplies daily to keep up with demand.
At ammunition sales…Blackburn’s local shop… Sales have quadrupoled since last year.
Larry Blackburn, Ammunition Sales: “You can thank President Obama for that, he’s the best salesman I never had to employ.”
Though the Obama Administration has introduced no legislation… Just the possibility is enough to make some people buy.
Ed Kessler, Gun owner: “I think people are nervous about the new administration and what is going to happen with gun control laws.”
“Everyone is in an uproar right now, they are buying guns, they are buying ammunition, but they don’t know what for.”
The most common type of handgun used for self defense… Blackburn says is a 380 automatic handgun.
Grace White, Reporter: “Since 380 ammunition is out of stock, this local gun shop is selling people the parts so they can make this on their own.”
Larry Blackburn, Ammunition Sales: “You threaten to take something away from somebody, they get upset and they buy everything they can get and that’s whats happened.”
It’s a solution that allows blackburn to keep a steady stream of sales and provide customers with what they want.
In Pensacola Grace White Channel Three News.
Larry Blackburn, Ammunition Sales: “If he would back off his stance on gun control and all this regulation, sells would settle back down to normal, but right now they are off the scale.”
We did check with another local gun shop who had 380 in stock… But they said you’ll pay a higher price for it than you did a few months ago.
The TRUTH about Coffee!
Ufocrossing 