Bloggy Award

MORE AT HTTP://WWW.UFOCROSSING.COM

Stunning UFO filmed by Russian Farmer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caawBUglZJI&feature=player_embedded

This rather remarkable UFO was filmed by a farmer apparently working in his fields in Russia. Not much is known about the video (below), the exact location of its filming or the individual that filmed it. It is receiving a fair bit of coverage on Russian UFO and paranormal forums and many UFO experts seem rather impressed with it.

One UFO researcher, Mr Avi Moas of Las Vegas, Nevada, referred to the craft as a ‘Mothership’.

Allegedly the filming took place on May 3 of this year. UFOs are seen all over Russia and the former Soviet Union and for many rural folk they are an almost common occurrence.

 

 

Earthlasthope

11 Videos
Please watch this footage from the 2008 RNC and earlier. There is clear evidence of a strong military police state that violates the Posse Comitatus act. Furthermore, the level of police brutality and unprovoked mass arrests of 200-500+ people at a time shows the blatant disrespect of the bill of rights and due process of law. Please watch and spread these videos.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=3B0F9D718A6B7957&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL

 

Fakes Hoaxes & Disinformation

12 videos
Fakes Hoaxes & Disinformation 12 Videos
Bogus information can really get in the way of TRUE understanding and enlightenment. A false sense of reality is worse than no sense at all! These videos can cause potential BRAINWASHING and should be frequently saturated with a more intellectually stimulating dogma!

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AFC42775BA1ADC8B&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL

 

Alien Scientist

http://www.extropedia.org

http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist

Alien Technology 101 – The REAL X-Files

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziicpZRqm-g

Introduction to Quasicrystals (the basics)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_VSpBI5EGM

 

Alien Technology – Invisibility and MetaMaterials

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voZXdqGQpgU

 

 

AntiGravity Physics Explained

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xnh5Nd4DzM

 

NanoEngineering Supermaterials

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLvjZ_TTrDM

 

Free Energy and Zero Point Energy Explained with Physics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SNfeL2nSXU

 

Alien Technology – The Infinite Battery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcCLIwlbhLc

 

The Power of Waves & Resonance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu68B7uzLUA

 

Alien Technology – Photonic Circuits & Quasicrystals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvSALm7Ps2k

 

Guide to Identifying UFOs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-KLmDBydv0

 

The Secret to Anti-Gravity REVEALED!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJJ-4lnwrck

 

What are Dimensions?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgwcCgF3BwI

 

Alien Anatomy, Species, & Genetics (part 1 of 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywqe7BTrTuI

 

Alien Anatomy, Species, & Genetics (part 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhA0UzGg1UA

 

Can you Handle the Truth?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt-BAaPpq-E

 

The Science Channel – Quasicrystals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VJqUwnrDMM

 

9/11 The Best Evidence & Science against NIST

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNCRnlKfQXc

 

Scott Forbes 9/11 power down: The Elephant In The Room

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brSXmZVVCMI

 

Debunking 9/11: NIST Building 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL03aJZIlyE

 


Metallic Crystal Mystery Solved!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u3pzMoTvUI

 

Obama to Disclose X-Files on Anti-Gravity Technology?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjAVCYNdPi4

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

FAX: 202-456-2461

President Barack Obama

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

I am writing you this letter in response to your recent decisions to probe deeper into anti-gravity technology and the so called “X-Files”, which in all probably are hiding some amazing and beneficial technologies that I think the American people are more than ready for. In terms of the National Security Risk Factor associated with disclosing material related to the UFO/extraterrestrial phenomena, I want to point out that many of us already know the truth were just waiting for the Government to come forward and admit to it.

As an avid UFO researcher, I have come across a few things that I would really like your National Security and Intelligence team to probe deeper into:

1. NASA was ordered to hand over documents in response to a March 27, 2007 federal Court ruling by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is hiding documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )

2. Former Area 51 employee and whistle blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Project for the US Military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. The fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates) have been investigated by Boeings [GRASP], NASAs Advance Concepts Office, & NASAs Gravity Probe B.

Thank you for your time and dedicated service to the American people.

Our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable time.

Sincerely,

THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC

 

Anti Gravity Disclosure movement at MIT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dycElONWdb4

Here is a memo you should FAX to:
National Security Advisor James L. Jones
National Intelligence Advisor Dennis Blair

Here’s that memo:

 

SUBJ: National Security Risk assessment for disclosure of UFO / Antigravity files.

What we know: Unidentified Flying Objects have been witnessed and photographed. Flying saucers or disc shaped craft, as well as a flying triangle shaped craft have been spotted, yet neither has been confirmed as belonging to the US Military.

1. NASA was ordered to hand over documents in response to a March 27, 2007 federal Court ruling by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is withholding secret documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )

2. Former Area 51 employee and whistle blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Project for the US Military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. The fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates) have been investigated by Boeings [GRASP], NASAs Advance Concepts Office, & NASAs Gravity Probe B.

What we don’t know: The origins of this technology, and why the Government is being so secretive about it? Many have suspicions that these craft are extraterrestrial in origin or that the technology was back-engineered from crashed alien space craft. Conspiracy theories abound as the American people receive lies and cover-ups from their Government instead of answers.

National Security Risk Assessment: There are several Risk Factors associated with disclosing the truth about extraterrestrial life, however there are no risks associated with disclosing anti-gravity technology. The notion that our enemies could use this technology against us is completely nullified by the technical feasibility of such a project. Russia, Iran and China are perhaps the only countries with the economic infrastructure capable of even producing such technology. An assembly line capable of manufacturing fleets of these aircraft would require an impossible feat of engineering. The only realistic applications for this technology are in space exploration through NASA

Thank you for your time and dedicated service to the American people. Our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable era of human history.

Sincerely,

 

MIT Researcher Responds to “Anti”-Gravity Tech

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIkLMv5fdNI

 

Roswell Aliens – Witness Descriptions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SWp_7p43pg

 

Roswell Flying Saucer – The Memory Foil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4xc3fs7rFc

REAL Alien SpaceCraft & Propulsion technologies

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z9U2ZUMTRQ

B2 Bomber and Electrogravitics

(Biefeld-Brown) Declassified

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jMYVmUzZpU

 

A Theory of Everything? – By Garrett Lisi (Part 1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Odtor8VIwM

A Theory of Everything? – By Garrett Lisi (Part 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHwOpfY43Lk

YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE THIS MORE PROOF END TIMES ARE HERE

GOVERNMENT COVER UP? 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDBuQya4io8

 

Alien Super Material Analyzed and Tested

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp97qpcClwA

 

A Theory of Everything: Physics,

Chemistry, Biology, & Mathematics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVdMRfZGK1s

 

Truth about the FEMA camps,coffins and graves NWO Proof

17 Videos
Please watch ALL PARTS! NOT JUST THE FIRST 2!!!
Truth about the FEMA camps,coffins and graves NWO Proof 17 Videos
Please watch ALL PARTS! NOT JUST THE FIRST 2!!!

After watching, please reupload them ASAP and spread them. Direct people to this channel and post links to our Youtube page – Myspace and soon website.

Everyone needs to see this!

This is 100% proof of FEMA coffins FEMA camps and FEMA graves! This is the best series on the net to show this. I have spent a lot of time putting it together so USE IT!

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=4996D9F670D3A796&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL

 

The Hidden Powers you have, power of your mind…

21 Videos
Its all about knowledge… Knowledge is power, and this will give you power…

I often tell people, “Knowledge is the exchange of different realities” I truly believe that.

If you want to feel good about yourself, feel empowered and realizes exactly how week the New World Order and the Illuminati are, then watch this video. This is deep thinking at its best and it should break something in you and snap you out of the shell your in.

This is information the Illuminati would love to bury. This is information that will change your life. I promise…

The war for your mind.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=B7EC3675AC23DF97&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL

 

Project Camelot interviews Gary McKinnon

http://freegary.org.uk

 

The President Who Told The TRUTH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE

The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
New York City, April 27, 1961

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.

You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.

You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.

We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the "lousiest petty bourgeois cheating."

But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.

If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight "The President and the Press." Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded "The President Versus the Press." But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.

If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.

On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.

It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future–for reducing this threat or living with it–there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security–a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President–two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.

I

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle

dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said–and your newspapers have constantly said–that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America–unions and businessmen and public officials at every level– will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

II

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news–for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security–and we intend to do it.

III

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.

About these ads